Workshop on Quality and Authenticity on resources.
Hello...
Readers!
Here is my blog on Quality and Authenticity on resources.
Workshop has organised by Dilip Barad sir at department of English.
The source educational evaluation rubric (seer) represent the evolution of critical approach that has Turnitin has adopted and used websites in the analysis of student source.
Introduction :
We are living in 21century ,in the world of technology and internet exploration where all research are done under digital platform. So, raise question in our mind is that how much trust and faith should be put on these web - resources, they are reliable or not and if they are than what is the quality of their products and information.
Turnity-prevent plagiarism engaged students has created one rubric for students to evaluate the source which is mostly use by students to check whether is it trustworthy or not and can we use it for academic purposes and for researches.
The source educational evaluation rubric (seer) represents the evolution of critical approach that Turnitin has adopted and used websites in analysis of students sources.
Rubric was designed by academic experts for students. The rubric is built on five criteria.
Authoritative
Educational value
Intent
Originality
Quality
Three websites:
1) https://www.wikipedia.com
2) https://www.britannica.com
3) https://www.sparknotes.com
Here is analysis of website sources and also :
1) https://www.wikipedia.com
Authoritative : 3 mark
In Authoritative I give 3 mark to Wikipedia. Wikipedia site is highly or well regarded site which give reference , cited and good content.
Educational value: 3 mark
Wikipedia site for educational value is a regarded source of content.
Intent : 4 mark
Wikipedia is highly regarded source which provide highly respected sources of content. Intention is Wikipedia is to provide many resources and inform to users
Originality : 2 mark
Wikipedia site is give some original content to users
Quality : 2 mark
Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is summary section are to long, this is longer than our actual article.
2) https://www.britannica.com
Authoritative : 4 mark
Britannica has work with the world's premier partner institutions and experts. work highly regarded site which give us appropriate knowledge and provide link, information is well regarded, well cited, written by author with expertise.
Educational value: 3 mark
Britannica is good for educational purposes . Its contents instructional goal. Britannica's expanding knowledge footprint, all with the goal of helping the world's curious minded and find information with confidence.
Intent : 4 mark
Britannica knowledge expert network. Britannica and to supporting the needs of our growing audience around the word.
Originality: 3 mark
It's contents is original but it is provided gathering sources which is some time give original sources.
Quality : 3 mark
Quality of Britannica sources is provided good content with short and valuable content.
3) https://www.sparknotes .com
Authoritative : 3 mark
Educational value : 3 mark
Intent : 2 mark
Originality : 3 mark
Quality: 4 mark
All three websites has different type of rubric evaluation. It is give reliable resources .
Thank you........
Hello...
Readers!
Here is my blog on Quality and Authenticity on resources.
Workshop has organised by Dilip Barad sir at department of English.
The source educational evaluation rubric (seer) represent the evolution of critical approach that has Turnitin has adopted and used websites in the analysis of student source.
Introduction :
We are living in 21century ,in the world of technology and internet exploration where all research are done under digital platform. So, raise question in our mind is that how much trust and faith should be put on these web - resources, they are reliable or not and if they are than what is the quality of their products and information.
Turnity-prevent plagiarism engaged students has created one rubric for students to evaluate the source which is mostly use by students to check whether is it trustworthy or not and can we use it for academic purposes and for researches.
The source educational evaluation rubric (seer) represents the evolution of critical approach that Turnitin has adopted and used websites in analysis of students sources.
Rubric was designed by academic experts for students. The rubric is built on five criteria.
Authoritative
Educational value
Intent
Originality
Quality
Three websites:
1) https://www.wikipedia.com
2) https://www.britannica.com
3) https://www.sparknotes.com
Here is analysis of website sources and also :
1) https://www.wikipedia.com
Authoritative : 3 mark
In Authoritative I give 3 mark to Wikipedia. Wikipedia site is highly or well regarded site which give reference , cited and good content.
Educational value: 3 mark
Wikipedia site for educational value is a regarded source of content.
Intent : 4 mark
Wikipedia is highly regarded source which provide highly respected sources of content. Intention is Wikipedia is to provide many resources and inform to users
Originality : 2 mark
Wikipedia site is give some original content to users
Quality : 2 mark
Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is summary section are to long, this is longer than our actual article.
2) https://www.britannica.com
Authoritative : 4 mark
Britannica has work with the world's premier partner institutions and experts. work highly regarded site which give us appropriate knowledge and provide link, information is well regarded, well cited, written by author with expertise.
Educational value: 3 mark
Britannica is good for educational purposes . Its contents instructional goal. Britannica's expanding knowledge footprint, all with the goal of helping the world's curious minded and find information with confidence.
Intent : 4 mark
Britannica knowledge expert network. Britannica and to supporting the needs of our growing audience around the word.
Originality: 3 mark
It's contents is original but it is provided gathering sources which is some time give original sources.
Quality : 3 mark
Quality of Britannica sources is provided good content with short and valuable content.
3) https://www.sparknotes .com
Authoritative : 3 mark
Educational value : 3 mark
Intent : 2 mark
Originality : 3 mark
Quality: 4 mark
All three websites has different type of rubric evaluation. It is give reliable resources .
Thank you........
Comments
Post a Comment