Skip to main content

Workshop on Quality and Authenticity of web resources.

Workshop on Quality and  Authenticity on resources.

 Hello...
Readers!

       Here is my blog on Quality and Authenticity on resources.
Workshop  has organised by Dilip Barad sir at department of English.
The source educational evaluation rubric (seer) represent the evolution of critical approach that has Turnitin has adopted and used websites in the analysis of student source.

Introduction :

            We are living in 21century ,in the world of technology and internet exploration where all research are done  under digital platform. So, raise question in our mind is that how much trust and faith should be put on these  web - resources, they are reliable or not and if they are than what is the quality of their products and information.

           Turnity-prevent plagiarism engaged students has created one rubric for students to evaluate the source which is mostly use by students to check whether is it trustworthy or not and can we use it for academic purposes and for researches.

            The source educational evaluation rubric (seer) represents the evolution of critical approach that Turnitin has adopted and used websites in analysis of students sources.

            Rubric was designed by academic experts for students. The rubric is built on five criteria.
       Authoritative
       Educational value
       Intent
       Originality
       Quality

Three websites:
    1) https://www.wikipedia.com
    2) https://www.britannica.com
    3) https://www.sparknotes.com

 Here is analysis of website sources and also  :

1) https://www.wikipedia.com

    Authoritative : 3 mark
   In Authoritative I give 3 mark to Wikipedia. Wikipedia site is highly or well regarded site which give reference , cited and good content.

   Educational value: 3 mark
   Wikipedia site for educational value is a regarded source of content.

   Intent : 4 mark
   Wikipedia is highly regarded source which provide highly respected sources of content. Intention is Wikipedia is to provide many resources and inform to users

   Originality : 2 mark
   Wikipedia site is give some original content to users

   Quality : 2 mark
    Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is summary section are to long, this is longer than our actual article.

   2) https://www.britannica.com

    Authoritative : 4 mark
   Britannica has work with the world's  premier partner institutions and experts. work highly regarded site which give us appropriate knowledge and provide link, information is well regarded, well cited, written by author with expertise.

   Educational value: 3 mark
   Britannica is good for educational purposes . Its contents instructional goal. Britannica's expanding knowledge footprint, all with the goal of helping the world's curious minded and find information with confidence.

   Intent : 4 mark
   Britannica knowledge expert network. Britannica and to supporting the needs of our growing audience around the word.

   Originality: 3 mark
   It's contents is original but it is provided gathering sources which is some time give original sources.

   Quality : 3 mark
   Quality of Britannica sources is provided good content with short and valuable content.

3) https://www.sparknotes .com

    Authoritative : 3 mark

    Educational value : 3 mark

     Intent : 2 mark

    Originality : 3 mark

   Quality: 4 mark


       All three websites has different type of rubric evaluation. It is give reliable resources .

           Thank you........


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SR : literature and religion : Northrop Frye- ritual, myth and archetypes of literature.

SR : literature and religion : Northrop Frye- ritual, myth and archetypes of literature.                       Hello readers!             Here is my blog on Northrop Frye and ritual, myth and archetypes of literature. This blog is given by Professor Dilip Barad Sir.             There is a very close relationship between literature and religion. literary criticism the term archetype denotes narrative designs, pattern of action, character type, theme and images which are identified in a major term of literature as well as in myth and social ritual.              Archetypal Criticism as it applies to literature is a form of criticism " that interprets a text by focusing on recurring myths and archetypes".            ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breath : Interpretation Challenge and Video shoots.

Breath : Interpretation Challenge and Video shoots.   Hello readers!              Here is my blog on Samuel Buckett's Shortest Play "Breath". This task is given by Dilip Barad sir. If you want to know, Click here to know more about blogs.             There is an Interpretation of Shortest Play by Samuel Buckett's. Giving Interpretation of Shortest Play is thirty seconds only. Martin Esslin first gave the term 'Theatre of the Absurd.' He was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1969. Few of his notable works are Waiting for Godot, Endgame, Happy Days and others. If we look at the script of the play, it is as follows. CURTAIN Up 1. Faint light on stage littered with miscellaneous rubbish. Hold about five seconds. 2. Faint brief cry and immediate inspiration and slow increase of light together reaching maximum - together in about ten seconds. Silence and hold for about fi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thinking Activity : Testing and Evaluating

Thinking Activity : Testing and Evaluating Here are some questions on Testing and Evaluating... 1 ) Write on Validity and reliability of the test . Reliability and validity are concepts used to evaluate the quality of research. They indicate how well a method, technique or test measures something. Reliability is about the consistency of a measure. Validity is about the accuracy of a measure. What is validity? Validity refers to how accurately a method measures what it is intended to measure. The validity of an instrument is the idea that the instrument measures what it intends to measure. High reliability is one indicator that a measurement is valid. If a method is not reliable, it probably isn’t valid. For example , imagine a researcher who decides to measure the intelligence of a sample of students. A test of physical strength, like how many push-ups a student could do, would be an invalid test of intelligence.  Types of validity 1 ) Construct 2 ) Content 3 ) Criterion What is ...
Post a Comment
Read more