Thinking Activity : CS : Unit : 3 : CS in practice : Hamlet and To His Coy mistress.

Thinking Activity : CS : Unit : 3 : CS in practice : Hamlet and To His Coy mistress.

1 . If two characters  were marginalized in Hamlet, they are even more so in stoppard's handling. If Shakespeare marginalized his powerless in his own Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, stoppard has marginalized in us all in era when - in the eyes of some- all of us are caught up in forces beyond our control?

            Two characters are marginalized in Hamlet. The two characters are Rosencrantz and Guidenstern. Shakespeare's Hamlet with a view to seeing power in its Cultural context. The play within the play Claudius is talking privately with Rosencrantz and Guidenstern both are Hamlet's fellow students from Wittenberg. Rosencrantz delivers speech and power of kingship. Guildenstern had agreed that he and Rosencrantz would do the king's bidding. Both speeches are among wholly in character for Rosencrantz and Guidenstern are jellyfish of Shakespeare's characters. The two are distinctly plot driven , empty of personality and favor with power.

         In the twentieth century dead, Rosencrantz and Guidenstern were Tom stoppard's version, seeking constantly to know who they are, why they are here, where they are going. "Are" is a question of this play. A Cultural and historical view that reflects a Cultural and philosophical view of time. In the twentieth century Rosencrantz and Guidenstern  are the little people who have been caught up in the corporate downsizing and decades. But power it is capital.

2 . The poem 'To His Coy Mistress tells us a lot about the speaker, the listener and also the audience for whom it is written. But what does it show- Implied Culture versus Historical Fact?

       Andrew Marvell's " To his Coy Mistress" tells the reader a good deal about the speaker of the poem, the listener and also the audience for whom it is written. But the show implied Culture versus Historical fact in the poem. 

       We know that the speaker is knowledgeable about poems and conventions of classic Greek and Roman literature about other conversations of love poetry.

       He clearly does not think of poverty, he shows that demographic and socioeconomic details how fortunate his circumstances are. Historical reality that the poem is ignored. The speaker thrust disease and death into the future. So here show the Cultural versus Historical fact.